What is a theocracy?
A theocracy is a form of government in which religious leaders hold direct political authority, or in which religious law and doctrine serve as the primary source of civil law, rather than authority being derived from a secular constitution or popular vote alone.
Last reviewed . Not yet independently reviewed.
Core tenets
- Religious authority as governing authority
- Political leadership is held by religious officials, or governing legitimacy is explicitly derived from religious doctrine rather than secular consent alone.
- Religious law as civil law
- The state's legal code is drawn directly from religious texts or religious legal tradition, rather than from a separately constructed secular legal system.
- Limited separation of religious and political institutions
- Religious and governing institutions overlap significantly, rather than operating as separated, independent spheres.
How it works in practice
The degree of overlap between religious and political authority varies; some theocracies place clergy directly in governing roles, while others retain elected officials operating under religious legal constraints.
- Religious judicial authority
- Courts applying religious law, staffed by religious scholars, handle matters that in a secular state would fall to civil courts.
- Clerical oversight bodies
- A body of religious leaders may hold formal authority to approve, reject, or override legislation passed by an elected body, based on compliance with religious doctrine.
Common variants
- Direct clerical rule
- Religious leaders themselves hold the top governing offices directly.
- Religious-legal theocracy
- Elected or appointed officials govern, but religious law and religious oversight bodies constrain and can override their decisions.
What it is often confused with
Theocracy is often confused with any state that has an official religion, but an official or majority religion alone does not make a state a theocracy unless religious authority and religious law also hold direct governing power.
Criticisms and debates
Criticism of theocracy centers on the treatment of religious minorities and dissenters, and on the difficulty of changing religiously grounded law through ordinary political processes.
Liberal critique
Argues that basing civil law on a single religious tradition disadvantages citizens who do not share that religion, and that religious authorities are not accountable to the electorate the way secular officials are.
Response: Defenders of theocratic government argue that grounding law in a shared religious framework provides moral and social cohesion that a purely secular legal system, in their view, lacks.
Separation-of-powers critique
Contends that combining religious and political authority in the same institutions removes an important check that exists when religious and civil authority are kept independent of each other.
Response: Some theocratic traditions respond that religious oversight is itself intended as a check, constraining elected officials from acting against fundamental religious and moral principles.
Historical examples
- Vatican City, ongoing
- Governing authority rests directly with the Pope as both religious and political head of state, a widely cited contemporary example of direct clerical rule.
- Islamic Republic of Iran, since 1979
- Combines elected officials with a Supreme Leader and clerical oversight bodies holding authority to approve candidates and overturn legislation on religious grounds.
Sources
- 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Religion and Political Theory.
- 2.Encyclopaedia Britannica. Theocracy.
- 3.Encyclopaedia Britannica. Vatican City.