What is a technocracy?
A technocracy is a form of government in which political authority and key decisions are held by technical experts, scientists, engineers, or economists, chosen for their specialized knowledge rather than through competitive election.
Last reviewed . Not yet independently reviewed.
Core tenets
- Expertise as the basis of authority
- Positions of governing authority are held or justified based on specialized technical knowledge, rather than electoral mandate or hereditary claim.
- Decisions framed as technical rather than political
- Policy questions are treated primarily as problems with an objectively correct technical answer, rather than as contested value trade-offs to be resolved through political debate.
- Reduced role for electoral politics
- Key decisions are made or heavily constrained by expert bodies rather than being fully subject to competitive electoral politics.
How it works in practice
Full technocracies, where experts hold ultimate governing authority directly, are rare; more common are technocratic elements within otherwise elected or other systems.
- Independent expert agencies
- Bodies such as central banks or regulatory agencies are given authority over specific technical domains, insulated from direct day-to-day political control.
- Technocratic government during crisis
- Some countries have installed a temporary government of appointed technical experts, rather than elected politicians, during acute economic or political crises.
Common variants
- Full technocracy
- Experts hold direct governing authority across the political system, a form with few complete historical examples.
- Technocratic insulation within a democracy
- Specific technical domains, such as monetary policy, are delegated to independent expert bodies, while elected officials retain authority over most other decisions.
What it is often confused with
Technocracy is often used loosely to describe any government that relies on expert advice, but the stronger technical claim is that experts hold actual governing authority, not merely an advisory role to elected officials.
Criticisms and debates
Criticism of technocracy centers on the loss of democratic accountability and the assumption that political questions have a single objectively correct technical answer.
Democratic accountability critique
Argues that appointed experts are not accountable to voters, and that many policy questions involve genuine value trade-offs, not just technical optimization, that citizens have a right to decide through elections.
Response: Defenders of technocratic elements argue that some technical domains, such as central bank interest-rate decisions, benefit from insulation from short-term electoral pressure specifically because that pressure can distort long-term technical judgment.
Expertise-limits critique
Contends that experts in a narrow technical field are not necessarily well-suited to weigh the broader social and political trade-offs a governing decision actually involves.
Response: Some defenders respond that this argues for combining technical bodies with democratic oversight, rather than against technical expertise having any governing role at all.
Historical examples
- Italy's Monti government, 2011 to 2013
- A government of appointed technical experts, rather than elected politicians, was installed to manage a sovereign debt crisis.
- Central banks generally, ongoing
- Many countries delegate monetary policy specifically to an independent, expert-staffed central bank, insulated from direct day-to-day political control, a limited and widely adopted technocratic element within otherwise democratic systems.
Sources
- 1.Veblen, Thorstein. The Engineers and the Price System. 1921.
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Epistemic Democracy.
- 3.Encyclopaedia Britannica. Technocracy.