What is an aristocracy?
An aristocracy is a form of government in which political power rests with a hereditary class of nobility, historically justified as rule by those considered best suited to govern by virtue of birth, breeding, or inherited status.
Last reviewed . Not yet independently reviewed.
Core tenets
- Hereditary noble class
- Political authority is held by members of families holding inherited noble titles, rather than by elected officials or a single monarch alone.
- Rule justified as rule by the best
- The term derives from the Greek for rule by the best, historically justified on the claim that a hereditary noble class was specifically bred, educated, and suited to govern well.
- Restricted political participation
- Political power and often landholding are concentrated among the noble class, with the broader population excluded from meaningful governing authority.
How it works in practice
Aristocratic power has historically operated both as a standalone governing system and as a class holding significant influence alongside a monarch or early parliament.
- Hereditary titles and landholding
- Noble status is typically tied to inherited land and formal titles, passed down through families across generations.
- Aristocratic council or chamber
- Many historical aristocracies formalized noble political power through a governing council or legislative chamber restricted to titled members.
Common variants
- Landed aristocracy
- Noble status and political power are tied directly to hereditary land ownership.
- Constitutional aristocratic chamber
- A hereditary noble body, such as a historical House of Lords, holds a formal legislative role alongside an elected chamber.
What it is often confused with
Aristocracy and oligarchy are closely related, but aristocracy specifically denotes rule by a hereditary noble class, while oligarchy is the broader category of rule by any small group, whatever its shared basis for power.
Criticisms and debates
Criticism of aristocracy centers on the illegitimacy of inherited political privilege and the absence of any merit-based justification for noble rule.
Egalitarian critique
Argues that inheriting political authority and privilege by birth has no legitimate connection to actual capacity to govern well, and unfairly excludes the broader population from political participation.
Response: Historical defenders of aristocracy argued that inherited wealth and education specifically prepared noble families to govern responsibly, a claim modern political philosophy largely rejects as unsupported.
Meritocratic critique
Contends that ability to govern well should be demonstrated, not inherited, making hereditary noble rule inconsistent with any genuine claim to rule by the best.
Response: This critique is broadly accepted in contemporary political thought, and few if any serious traditions today defend hereditary aristocratic rule on its original merit-based justification.
Historical examples
- Ancient Sparta
- Governed in part by a hereditary aristocratic council, the Gerousia, alongside its kings and elected officials.
- Pre-revolutionary France
- The nobility held extensive hereditary land, legal privilege, and political influence under the Ancien Regime, before the French Revolution abolished formal noble privilege.
Sources
- 1.Aristotle. Politics. Book III, on aristocracy as rule by the virtuous few.
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Political Legitimacy.
- 3.Encyclopaedia Britannica. Aristocracy.