What is democratic socialism?
Democratic socialism holds that the means of production should move toward collective or social ownership, but pursues that goal exclusively through existing democratic institutions, competitive elections, and parliamentary process, rather than through revolution or a vanguard party.
Last reviewed . Not yet independently reviewed.
Core tenets
- Collective ownership as a goal
- Like other socialist traditions, it holds that major productive property should ultimately be owned socially rather than privately, though the pace and extent are pursued gradually.
- Commitment to existing democratic process
- Change is pursued exclusively through elections, legislation, and other institutions already recognized as democratic, explicitly rejecting revolutionary seizure of power.
- Political pluralism
- Multiple political parties, free elections, and civil liberties are treated as permanent features to be preserved, not a transitional stage to be dispensed with once in power.
- Gradualism
- Economic transformation is expected to happen incrementally, through legislation and public ownership expanded over time, rather than through a single revolutionary break.
How it works in practice
In practice, democratic socialist parties and movements have pursued a range of policies that combine elements of expanded public ownership with an otherwise market-based economy.
- Public ownership of key industries
- Nationalizing specific sectors, such as utilities, transportation, or banking, while leaving most of the economy in private hands.
- Expanded social provision
- Universal public healthcare, public housing, and strong labor protections are typically central policy goals, funded through taxation rather than direct state ownership of most enterprises.
- Electoral coalition-building
- Democratic socialist parties compete for votes within existing multi-party systems, forming coalitions and compromising with other parties as elections and legislatures require.
Common variants
- Social democracy
- A closely related, often overlapping tradition that accepts a predominantly capitalist market economy but pursues extensive redistribution and public services within it; some use the terms interchangeably, others treat social democracy as having given up the goal of full collective ownership.
- Eco-socialism
- Combines democratic socialist goals with an explicit focus on ecological sustainability, arguing that unchecked market growth is incompatible with environmental limits.
What it is often confused with
Democratic socialism is very often confused with social democracy, and both are frequently confused with the much broader everyday use of socialism to mean any government program.
Criticisms and debates
Criticism of democratic socialism comes from both market-oriented and more revolutionary socialist traditions, for different reasons.
Market-oriented critique
Argues that expanding collective ownership and heavy redistribution, even pursued gradually and democratically, still runs into the same calculation and incentive problems raised against socialism generally.
Response: Democratic socialists respond that a mixed approach, retaining markets and prices for most of the economy while socializing specific sectors, avoids the sharpest version of the calculation problem, which applies most forcefully to full central planning.
Revolutionary socialist critique
From within the broader socialist tradition, some argue that pursuing change only through existing institutions leaves the underlying structure of private capital largely intact, since owners of capital retain substantial power to resist reform through those same institutions.
Response: Democratic socialists respond that avoiding revolutionary rupture preserves political pluralism and civil liberties, and that historical attempts at revolutionary transition produced authoritarian outcomes they consider a worse trade-off.
Historical examples
- Nordic social democratic parties, twentieth century
- Parties such as Sweden's Social Democrats built extensive public provision and, in earlier decades, pursued explicit goals of expanding collective and public ownership through parliamentary majorities.
- British Labour Party, 1945 government
- Nationalized major industries, including coal, rail, and steel, through ordinary parliamentary legislation after winning a general election, a frequently cited example of pursuing socialist goals through existing democratic process.
Sources
- 1.Bernstein, Eduard. Evolutionary Socialism. 1899.
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Socialism.
- 3.Encyclopaedia Britannica. Democratic socialism.